Guideline Resources
Prostate Cancer Screening in Asymptomatic Pts | epocrates Guideline Synthesis
Key Points
AAFP and BMJ recommend against routine PSA screens; USPSTF emphasizes individualized decision-making after being informed of potential benefits/harms. NCI notes inadequate evidence for benefit and good evidence for harms. In contrast, NCCN and AUA say to offer baseline PSA (±DRE). Biomarkers to improve specificity not recommended as 1st-line screen. Don’t screen if life expectancy <10y. Follow same guidance for transgender women, regardless of hormone tx or gonadectomy. Varied guidance on whether African American, FHx, other risk factors warrant earlier/more-frequent screening. ACS recommends initiation of discussion of benefits, risks, and uncertainties, based on age and risk.
Choose Patient Type
Peer reviewed & based on multiple guidelines/recommendations from specialty societies/government agencies
Epocrates Guideline Synopsis Last Update: Aug 27, 2024
Publication Year:
2024
Source:
epocrates
AAFP/USPSTF Grades
[A] Recommended. High certainty net benefit is substantial; offer the service
[B] Recommended. High certainty net benefit is mod; or mod certainty net benefit is mod to substantial
[C] Recommended selectively to individuals per professional judgment, pt preference; at least mod certainty of small net benefit
[D] Discouraged. Mod or high certainty that service has no net benefit, or that harms outweigh benefits
[I] Insufficient evidence to assess balance of benefits/harms; evidence lacking, poor quality, or conflicting
AUA Statement Type
[SR] Strong recommendation: Net benefit or harm substantial
[MR] Moderate recommendation: Net benefit or harm moderate
[CR] Conditional recommendation: Net benefit or harm comparable w/ other options
[CP] Clinical Principle: Widely agreed upon by urologists/other clinicians; may or may not be medical literature evidence
[EO] Expert Opinion: Panel consensus based on clinical training, experience, knowledge, judgment; no evidence in medical literature
AUA Evidence Strength
[AUA-A] High
[AUA-B] Moderate
[AUA-C] Low or very low
NCCN Category
[1] High-level evidence, uniform NCCN consensus that intervention is appropriate
[2A] Lower-level evidence, uniform NCCN consensus that intervention is appropriate
[2B] Lower-level evidence, NCCN consensus that intervention is appropriate
[3] Any level of evidence, major NCCN disagreement that intervention is appropriate
Abbreviations
AAFP American Academy of Family Physicians
ACP American College of Physicians
ACS American Cancer Society
ASCO American Society of Clinical Oncology
AUA American Urological Association
BMJ British Medical Journal
BPH benign prostatic hypertrophy
BRCA breast cancer genes
CA cancer
DRE digital rectal exam
first-deg first-degree (parent, sibling, offspring)
HNPCC hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
mod moderate
NCCN National Comprehensive Cancer Network
NCI National Cancer Institute
PCF Prostate Cancer Foundation
USPSTF U.S. Preventive Services Task Force