Guideline Resources
Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Pts | epocrates Guideline Synthesis
Key Points
If ≥65 yo or risk factors: Check BMD; if specific risks, check for vertebral fx. Osteoporosis dx established by BMD T-score ≤−2.5 or low-trauma vertebral/hip fx in adulthood. Use FRAX risk-assessment tool. Individualize drug tx duration; shouldn’t be indefinite. Address Ca++, vit D, exercise, fall prevention.
Choose Patient Type
Peer reviewed & based on multiple guidelines/recommendations from specialty societies/government agencies.
Epocrates Guideline Synopsis Last Update: May 13, 2024
Publication Year:
2024
Source:
epocrates
AACE/ACE Strength of Recommendation
[A] Multiple, well-designed RCTs/cohort controlled trials; ≥1 conclusive level 1 pub showing benefit > risk
[B] ≥1 large, well-designed clinical trial/cohort/case control study/meta-analysis; ≥1 conclusive level 2 pub showing benefit > risk
[C] Clinical experience/descriptive studies/expert consensus opinion; ≥1 conclusive level 3 pub showing benefit > risk
[D] Not rated; no conclusive level 1-3 pubs showing benefit > risk; conclusive level 1-3 pubs showing risk > benefit
AACE/ACE Quality of Evidence
[1] Meta-analysis of RCTs, RCTs
[2] Meta-analysis from nonrandomized prosp/case-control trials; non-RCT; prosp cohort trial; retro case-control study
[3] Cross sectional study; surveillance study; case series; single-case reports
[4] No evidence (theory, opinion, consensus, or review)
ACOG 2012 Strength of Recommendation
[ACOG-A] Recommendations are based on good and consistent scientific evidence
[ACOG-B] Recommendations are based on limited or inconsistent scientific evidence
[ACOG-C] Recommendations are based primarily on consensus and expert opinion
ACOG 2021 Strength of Recommendation
[ACOG-S] Strong. Benefits clearly outweigh harms and burdens, or harms and burdens clearly outweigh benefits
[ACOG-C] Conditional. Balance of benefits & risks varies dep. on pt characteristics/values/preferences; use shared decision-making
ACOG Quality of Evidence
[ACOG-H] High-quality; RCT, systematic review, meta-analysis; very strong evidence from obs. study; no serious flaws, limitations
[ACOG-M] Mod-quality; RCTs w/ some limitations; strong evidence from obs. studies w/o serious methodological flaws or limitations
[ACOG-L] Low-quality; RCTs w/ serious flaws; some evidence from observational studies
[ACOG-VL] Very low-quality; unsystematic clinical observations; very indirect evidence from observational studies
[GPP] Good Practice Point; based on expert opinion & avail. evidence (incorporated when inadequate or nonexistent evidence)
ACP Strength of Recommendation
[S] Strong. Benefits clearly outweigh risks and burden, or risks and burden clearly outweigh benefits
[C] Conditional. Benefits probably outweigh risks and burden, or vice versa, but there’s appreciable uncertainty
ACP Certainty of Evidence
[H] High
[M] Moderate
[L] Low
[IE] Insufficient evidence to determine net benefits or risks
ACR Rating Scale
[7-9] Usually appropriate
[4-6] May be appropriate
[1-3] Usually not appropriate
Endocrine Society Strength of Recommendation
[ES-S] Strong; benefits clearly outweigh harms
[ES-C] Conditional; benefits closely balanced w/ harms and burdens
Endocrine Society Quality of Evidence
[ES-H] High quality; well performed RCTs; very strong EV from unbiased observational studies
[ES-M] Mod quality; RCTs w/ some limitations; strong EV from unbiased observational studies
[ES-L] Low quality; RCTs w/ serious flaws; some EV from observational studies
[ES-VL] Very low quality; unsystematic clinical observations; very indirect EV from observational studies
Abbreviations
secondary
25(OH)D 25-hydroxy vitamin D
AACE American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists
abs antibodies
ACE American College of Endocrinology
ACOG American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
ACP American College of Physicians
ACR American College of Radiology
ADR adverse drug reaction
AIDS acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
ASBMR American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
BMD bone-mineral density
BMI body mass index
BP bisphosphonate
BSAP bone-specific alkaline phosphatase
Ca++ calcium
chemo-tx chemotherapy
CTX C-telopeptide
DEXA dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
DM diabetes mellitus
DMPA depot medroxyprogesterone acetate
DVT deep vein thrombosis
ES Endocrine Society
EtOH alcohol
Fe iron
FRAX fracture risk assessment tool
fx fracture
GC glucocorticoid
GnRH gonadotropin-releasing hormone
HIV human immunodeficiency virus
ht height
hx history
IBD inflammatory bowel disease
L-spine lumbar spine
NOF National Osteoporosis Foundation
NTX urinary N-telopeptide
OC osteocalcin
phos phosphorus
PINP aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen
PPI proton-pump inhibitor
PTH parathyroid hormone
RANKLi receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand inhibitor
RDA recommended daily allowance
SERM selective estrogen receptor modulator
SSRI selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
T-score BMD calculation that references same-sex young-adult reference population; normal T-score ≥−1, low bone density (osteopenia) T-score between −1 and −2.5, osteoporosis T-score ≤−2.5
T1DM type 1 diabetes mellitus
T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus
TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone
TZD thiazolidinedione
USPSTF United States Preventive Services Task Force
vit vitamin
wt weight